Editorial Dust-Up at BusinessInsider
Posted on Sunday, July 29, 2018 at 1:55 PM
In the news: How Business Insider's editorial management
handled a recent controversy.
Business Insider
recently found itself in the hot seat when conservative writer Daniella
Greenbaum published an op-ed piece defending the controversial casting
of actress Scarlett Johansson as a transgender character. The backlash
was swift and culminated in Greenbaum's resignation from the
publication, prompting further backlash from conservative media outlets.
Greg
Dool discusses the controversy in a July 12 Foliomag.com piece. Citing
reporting done in the Daily Beast, he notes that Business
Insider's executive editors will now vet culturally sensitive
content to avoid future dust-ups. Dool pulls no punches in his
assessment: "If Business Insider's editorial standards are
such that a column must be taken down ... who the hell was monitoring
this stuff before? Were potential red flags not heralded by Greenbaum's
prior 'hot takes'?" The problem, he argues, is that this kind of crisis
might have been avoided with more vigilant editorial oversight of op-ed
content: "It sets a dangerous precedent when the act of editing is so
easily misconstrued as censorship, and publishing a poorly reasoned and
ill-defended column only to rescind it in response to public pressure
undermines the importance of editorial discretion in the first place."
Read the full article here.
Also
Notable:
Hearst's Plans for the Future
Last
week Troy Young, the new president of Hearst magazines, sat down with AdWeek
to discuss his plans for the company. He discusses his prior experience
in digital but reassures readers that the publisher will work to
maximize potential for its print products as well. Most notably, he
echoes a sentiment shared by some other major publishers: "We're a
content company. I say that because I sometimes worry that the term
'magazine' can put you in a box.... How do we [service customers better]
in video, in digital, in voice and in print?" Read the full interview here.
Shifting
Editorial Focus at Women's Magazines
Women's magazines have
struggled at the newsstands in recent years, but some are experiencing a
resurgence in today's highly charged political climate. Some top titles
are funneling resources into political reporting to serve readers
increasingly concerned with sociopolitical issues. Riley Griffin of
Bloomberg.com writes, "Editors at top women's titles such as Cosmopolitan
and Marie Claire are ramping up coverage of sexual harassment,
reproductive rights and identity politics. As younger American women use
digital platforms to mobilize politically, these editors know they'll
have to meet readers where they're most engaged. There's a lot of money
to be made there, too." Read Griffin's full piece here.
Misinformation
Campaigns in the Fact-Checking World
Last week, Daniel Funke
of Poynter.org issued a caveat regarding misinformation campaigns
against fact-checking sites, citing recent incidents on PolitiFact and
other fact-checking organizations. "Hoaxers regularly go after
fact-checkers to delegitimize their work and reinforce their own
ideology," he warns. Read the full article here.
Add
your comment.